Fitch Affirms Telefonica del Peru at 'BBB+'; Outlook Stable

jueves 29 de septiembre de 2016 16:06 GYT

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) CHICAGO, September 29 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed Telefonica del Peru S.A.A.'s (TDP) Long-Term Foreign and Local-Currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) at 'BBB+' with a Stable Outlook. KEY RATING DRIVERS TDP's ratings reflect the company's dominant market positions in the Peruvian telecom industry and robust cash flow generation from its fully integrated fixed-line and mobile operations, which have supported its strong financial profile. The ratings are tempered by intense competition, especially with new entrants' aggressive marketing efforts, and the growing industry maturity, which have led to the company's profitability deterioration. The ratings also reflect its linkage with the parent, Telefonica SA (TEF, IDR 'BBB'/Outlook Stable), in terms of strategic ties and shareholder return policy, which could potentially affect TDP's financial profile. Strong Market Position: TDP is the largest telecom operator in Peru and Fitch expects its dominant position in both the fixed and mobile segments to remain intact backed by its well-established network competitiveness and strong brand recognition despite increasing competitive pressures. Competition for market share in the Peruvian mobile industry has materially increased following the entrance of the Chilean telecom operator, Empresa Nacional de Telecomunicaciones S.A. (Entel; rated 'BBB'/Outlook Negative) in 2013, due to its aggressive marketing campaign to quickly achieve a sizable scale. Although a modest market share loss with continued margin erosion could continue for TDP going forward, Fitch believes that the company's financial capacity to support high investment and marketing expenses will enable it to fend off competitive threats to an extent, and help maintain market leadership. TDP retained its largest market shares across all of its service platforms, with a 50% subscriber market share for mobile operations as of March 2016. The company also held 81% and 67% subscriber market shares for broadband and pay-TV, respectively, according to the regulator, Organismo Supervisor de Inversion Privada en Telecomunicaciones (Osiptel). Strong Cash Flow Generation: TDP boasts solid internal cash flow generation, which Fitch expects to continue over the medium term and help support its conservative financial profile. The company continued deleveraging during 2015, as cash flow from operations (CFFO) of PEN2.6 billion comfortably covered its capex of PEN1.8 billion and insignificant dividends of PEN331,000. During 2012-2015, the company's average free cash flow (FCF) margin was a solid 6%, which was mostly used to pay down its debt. Fitch forecasts the company's FCF generation to temporarily turn negative in 2016 due to high capex, mainly associated with its 700Mhz spectrum acquisition for USD315 million, but it should reverse back to positive in 2017 in the absence of any sizable dividends, or materialization of contingent liabilities with regard to its income tax disputes against the Superintendencia Nacional de Administracion Tributariabeing (SUNAT). Fitch expects TDP's CFFO to consistently be PEN2.1billion-PEN2.2 billion annually in 2016 and 2017, which should fully cover its recurring capex of about PEN1.8 billion, estimated by Fitch, excluding one-off spectrum auctions. This level of pre-dividend FCF generation with its low leverage should provide some headroom for its shareholder distributions or contingent liability, if necessary. The company made provisions of PEN1.6 billion in June 2015 for the pending SUNAT-related legal disputes. Solid Financial Profile: Fitch forecasts TDP's net leverage to remain low for the rating category over the medium term. TDP has continued to improve its financial profile backed by its robust positive FCF generation, which has mostly been used to pay off the debt. During the five years from 2011 to 2015, the company reduced its net debt by PEN2.3 billion to PEN837 million at end-2014 from PEN3.1 billion at end-2011. This has led to its net leverage, measured by EBITDAR / adjusted net debt, falling to 0.3x from 1.1x during the same period. Fitch forecasts net leverage to remain well below 1.0x over the medium term given TDP's solid FCF generating ability, following a slight increase in 2016 to 0.6x due to the spectrum acquisition. Margin Erosion due to Competitive Pressures: TDP's ongoing profitability deterioration is unlikely to be curbed in the short- to medium-term. Intense competition in the mobile market remains centered on handset subsidies and aggressive tariffs, which makes it difficult to cut subscriber acquisition costs or mitigate negative pressures on the industry-wide ARPU. The trend will continue as operators try to increase the penetration of smartphones to boost mobile data revenues. During the first half of 2016, the company's EBITDA margin fell to 29%, which compares negatively to 32% in 2015 and in 2014. KEY ASSUMPTIONS Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for TDP include: --Muted medium-term revenue growth following negative growth in 2016; --Mobile market share gradually declines towards 45% in the long term due to competition; --EBITDA margin to remain under 30% over the medium term; --FCF to turn negative in 2016 due to high capex; but to revert back to positive from 2017; --Net leverage to remain below 1.0x over the medium term in the absence of any sizable shareholder distribution or contingent liability payments. RATING SENSITIVITIES Negative rating action will be considered in case of material deterioration in the company's key operating and financial metrics which are due to competitive/regulatory pressures, higher-than-expected capex and shareholder distributions, or any substantial negative impact from the pending legal dispute with SUNAT over income tax issues - all of which combined result in the company's net leverage increasing to over 2x on a sustained basis. TDP's ratings are not directly linked to the ratings of its parent, TEF. However, any significant deterioration in the parent's credit profile, to the effect that it results in further rating downgrades or in a material liquidity crunch for the parent, could place pressure on TDP's ratings. TEF is currently rated 'BBB'/Outlook Stable. Conversely, an upgrade of TDP's ratings, resulting in more than one-notch differential from the parent's 'BBB' rating, would be limited given their strong linkages. LIQUIDITY TDP maintains a sound liquidity profile given its high cash balance of PEN1.5 billion fully covering short-term debt of PEN931 million as of June 30, 2016. The company also has well-spread debt maturities. The company's main source of liquidity, in addition to the cash on hand, is its strong internal cash generation and its undrawn committed credit facilities in the amount of PEN780 million, which further bolsters its financial flexibility. Contact: Primary Analyst Alvin Lim, CFA Director +1-312-368-3114 Fitch Ratings, Inc. 70 West Madison Street Chicago, IL 60602 Secondary Analyst Josseline Jenssen Director +00511-372-0681 Committee Chair Joe Bormann, CFA Managing Director +1-312-368-3349 Media Relations: Elizabeth Fogerty, New York, Tel: +1 (212) 908 0526, Email: Additional information is available on Applicable Criteria Criteria for Rating Non-Financial Corporates (pub. 27 Sep 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here _id=1012417 Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ail=31 ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001